Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Imprint cytology of needle-localized breast lesions.

Authors: A S, Shabaik; C E, Cox; R A, Clark; D S, Reintgen; E J, Humphrey; S V, Nicosia;

Imprint cytology of needle-localized breast lesions.

Abstract

Intraoperative evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions by frozen section frequently is not performed because of potential tissue loss, sampling errors and frozen section artifacts. In a retrospective review we found that only 50 of 503 needle-localized breast biopsies (NLBBs) were evaluated at our institution by frozen section (FS), with a sensitivity of 88%. However, intraoperative evaluation of such lesions may be essential to single-stage and cost-effective management. To this end, this study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical role of intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) in NLBB. A total of 88 lesions were evaluated by IIC and permanent histology. Fifteen of them were also concomitantly evaluated by FS. All but one deferred cytologic diagnoses were correct. Twelve of 15 FS diagnoses were correct, 2 were deferred, and 1 was false negative. The data suggest that IIC may circumvent some of the difficulties associated with FS, thereby allowing immediate clinical management and later definitive histologic typing and evaluation of prognostic parameters in nonpalpable breast lesions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adenoma, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Carcinoma, Frozen Sections, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Breast

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!