
As physicians begin to use computer technology in front of patients during clinical encounters, concern has been raised that such computer use may exert a dehumanizing effect on the physician-patient relationship. To investigate this concern, we measured patient reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters.Adult patients who presented for clinical care were randomized into three groups. With the first group, the physician used a standard paper-and-pencil charting system during the encounter. With the second group, the physician used a computerized medical record system with keyboard input. With the third group, the physician used the computerized medical record system with voice input. Patient reactions were measured with a questionnaire that the patients completed after the clinical encounter.For most components of the physician-patient relationship studied in this report, questionnaire scores did not differ significantly among the three study groups. Patients in the voice input group rated physician explanations of patient problems significantly higher than patients in the other two groups. There was a trend for patient confidence in the physician to be higher in the keyboard input group. Although measured encounter durations were significantly shorter in the computer groups, there were no differences in patient satisfaction with encounter duration among the three groups.Physician use of computers during clinical encounters was not associated with a decline in the perceived quality of the physician-patient relationship.
Adult, Physician-Patient Relations, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Writing, Medical Records, Random Allocation, Patient Satisfaction, Voice, Humans, Prospective Studies
Adult, Physician-Patient Relations, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Writing, Medical Records, Random Allocation, Patient Satisfaction, Voice, Humans, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
