
This study included 168 patients with angina pectoris, who were divided into two groups, the diltiazem SR (No. 88) group and diltiazem HCL (No. 80) group. The two groups were comparable in age and duration of coronary heart disease. The results were as follows: (1) The total clinical effect of diltiazem SR (94.3%) was slightly greater than that of diltiazem HCL (82.5%), the effect in ECG improvement was 53.3% and 53.4% respectively. (2) The rate of adverse effect was 12.5% in diltiazem SR group and 14.4% in diltiazem HCL group. It is concluded that the two different types of diltiazem have similar effect in the treatment of angina pectoris. However, it is more convenient to take diltiazem SR than diltiazem HCL as the former needs only twice a day.
Adult, Diltiazem, Electrocardiography, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Single-Blind Method, Middle Aged, Aged, Angina Pectoris
Adult, Diltiazem, Electrocardiography, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Single-Blind Method, Middle Aged, Aged, Angina Pectoris
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
