Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[The significance of HPV 16, 18 infection and the DNA ploidy associated with the progression of uterine cervical dysplasia].

Authors: M, Ohta; M, Ikeda;

[The significance of HPV 16, 18 infection and the DNA ploidy associated with the progression of uterine cervical dysplasia].

Abstract

We investigated the significance of HPV 16, 18 infection and DNA ploidy in the progression to malignancy of uterine cervical dysplasia. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical and biopsy specimens obtained from 59 women were examined. The 59 women were classified into two groups: one of progression cases and the other regression cases. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and dot blot hybridization (DBH) were used for the detection of HPV 16/18 DNA, while flow cytometry was used for the analysis of the relative cellular DNA content in samples prepared by Hedley's method. Eight out of 29 progression cases (27.6%) and 3 out of 30 regression cases (10.0%) exhibited HPV 16/18 DNA, whereas 14 out of 29 progression cases (48.3%) and 2 out of 30 regression cases (6.7%) involved a DNA aneuploid population, representing a DNA index in the former above 1.5 and in the latter below 1.5. The proportion of cases having a population of DNA aneuploid together with the presence of HPV 16/18 DNA was 20.7% (6/29) in the progression group and 0% (0/30) in the regression group. These results indicate that the DNA aneuploid population coupled with simultaneous HPV 16, 18 infection may be used as a marker for progression in uterine cervical dysplasia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Tumor Virus Infections, Ploidies, DNA, Viral, Humans, Female, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Papillomaviridae, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!