Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[A comaprative study of continuous warm blood cardioplegia].

Authors: N, Yamamoto;

[A comaprative study of continuous warm blood cardioplegia].

Abstract

Blood cardioplegia (BCP) has been reported as a superior method of myocardial protection, because of its oxygenating and buffering potential, but it is unknown which temperature is most effective. This study was performed to investigate the efficacy of continuous warm blood cardioplegia (CWBCP) versus continuous cold blood cardioplegia (CCBCP) in regard to metabolism, serum enzyme release, cardiac function and edema. Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were subjected to total cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp of the aorta for 120 minutes, and followed by 60 minutes' reperfusion. The dogs were divided into two groups according to the differences of BCP temperature: Group W, 33 degrees C warm BCP, and Group C, 16 degrees C cold BCP with topical cooling. Myocardial oxygen extraction during aortic cross-clamping was significantly higher in group W than in group C. Changes in excess lactate (delta XL) and redox potential (delta Eh) of lactate and pyruvate showed that aerobic metabolism could be maintained in group W and could not in group C. Lipid peroxides (LPO) were measured in coronary artery and sinus blood at the same time, so generations of LPO (A-Cs difference) at 5 minutes after reperfusion were significantly lower in group C than in group W (-0.140 +/- 0.125 nmol/ml V.S. 0.019 +/- 0.093). The incidence of ventricular fibrillation after reperfusion was significantly lower in group W than in group C (1/7 V.S. 7/7). CPK-MB and HBDH releases were significantly lower in group W than in group C during aortic clamp and 60 minutes' reperfusion (47 +/- 15 IU/l, 138 +/- 72 V.S. 94 +/- 24, 229 +/- 71).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Dogs, Oxygen Consumption, Body Water, Myocardium, Heart Arrest, Induced, Temperature, Animals, Myocardial Reperfusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!