Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Biliary ascariasis].

Authors: K M, Fang; C L, Yen; C L, Chen;

[Biliary ascariasis].

Abstract

From January 1982 to September 1987, ten diagnosed cases of biliary ascariasis were collected among 8,160 cases who were admitted for biliary tract diseases in our hospital. It represented an incidence of 0.12% in our hospital. In our series, the patients' ages ranged from 33 to 68 years old, with a female predominances. The clinical impression on admission were those of biliary tract stone, infection or pancreatitis. Signs and symptoms of biliary ascariasis were abdominal pain, fever, jaundice, vomiting of round worms and distended gallbladder. Laboratory findings disclosed leukocytosis, mildly elevated alkaline phosphatase, transaminase and bilirubin. There was a relatively high incidence of positive bile culture for bacteria. The reliable diagnostic tools for biliary ascariasis were abdominal real-time ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). They yielded a diagnostic rate of 40% and 87.5% respectively in our series. The principles of management of biliary ascariasis were conservative treatments including intravenous fluids, nasogastric decompression, antibiotics and antihelmintic agents. Other treatments that were also tried included endoscopic removal of round worms through a T-tube, or nasobiliary drainage. Surgery was considered when there were signs of complications, such as uncontrolled sepsis or suppurative cholangitis. The prognosis of biliary ascariasis was good if patients were diagnosed and treated properly. Regular follow-up with antihelmintic agents is also recommended to avoid reinfection.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Ascariasis, Cholelithiasis, Biliary Tract Diseases, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!