
The American Association of Pediatric Urology initiated a Pediatric Urological Manpower Study in 1991. A 24-question survey was distributed to the members of the Society of Pediatric Urology and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology. The objective of the questionnaire was to obtain information related to fellowship training, regional distribution of pediatric urologists, and practice patterns and attitudes. As of December 31, 1991, 345 questionnaires were distributed, and 244 (71%) were completed and entered into a computer program. The number of pediatric urologists was evenly distributed among 3 consecutive 10-year age groups ranging between age 31 and 60 years. The majority (78%) of urologists practicing 100% pediatric urology were between 31 and 50 years old. Approximately 60% of the responders practiced full-time (100%) pediatric urology and 59% of this group were university based. Pediatric urologists were practicing in 42 states and the District of Columbia. Based upon the United States Department of Commerce 1990 census, the number of pediatric urologists practicing in each state in relation to the total pediatric (less than 18 years old) populations was determined. The number of pediatric urology fellowships has steadily increased since the mid 1950s. Currently, more than 10 fellows are trained annually. Of the 172 responders practicing at least 75% pediatric urology 24% indicated that practice was "too busy" and 53% indicated that practice was "just right." Approximately 44% of the responders were considering adding a partner: 21 indicated that they planned to add a partner in 1 year, 65 in 5 years and 10 in 10 years. Hopefully, the Pediatric Urological Manpower Study will serve as a useful instrument for assessing the pediatric practice patterns and training needs in the United States, thereby enhancing the quality of urological care for children.
Urology, Workforce, Humans, Pediatrics, United States
Urology, Workforce, Humans, Pediatrics, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
