Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Heterogeneity of concanavalin A receptors on Ehrlich tumor cells.

Authors: H G, Rittenhouse; G M, Benian; J W, Rittenhouse; E R, Hansen; L E, Boyd;

Heterogeneity of concanavalin A receptors on Ehrlich tumor cells.

Abstract

Concanavalin A (Con A)-binding glycoproteins have been purified from Ehrlich ascites tumor cells by precipitation of cell extracts with Con A in agarose gels and by lithium diiodosalicylate (LIS) extraction. Antisera prepared against these two glycoprotein fractions indicate the presence of a minimum of five different antigens in the Con A-cell extract precipitate and a minimum of three different antigens in the LIS-extracted preparation. That both kinds of antisera are directed towards surface membrane antigens is strongly suggested by the fact that they give precipitin bands with purified plasma membrane from Ehrlich cells, they agglutinate whole cells, and they no longer give precipitin bands after absorption by whole cells. Cell extract material which was specifically eluted from a Con A-Sepharose 4B column with alpha-methylmannoside was recognized by antisera to both glycoprotein preparation, demonstrating that the antigens were Con A-binding components; material which did not bind the column failed to react with either antisera. Immunochemical analysis indicated that one of the antigens present in the LIS-extracted material was distinct from the five antigens prepared by lectin precipitation in agarose gels suggesting that a minimum of six individual Con A receptors are present on the surface of Ehrlich tumor cells. Immunochromatography was found to be a convenient method to purify the antigens obtained by the LIS extraction of Ehrlich cells.

Keywords

Male, Immunodiffusion, Binding Sites, Receptors, Drug, Cell Membrane, Molecular Weight, Mice, Concanavalin A, Animals, Binding Sites, Antibody, Rabbits, Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor, Immunoelectrophoresis, Glycoproteins, Protein Binding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!