
Lignocaine spray for anaesthetising the nasal mucosa for fibreoptic bronchoscopy often causes discomfort to the patient. We compared two techniques of applying nasal topical anaesthesia using either lignocaine spray (group A: 25 patients) or gel (group B: 30 patients) to assess patients' tolerance to the procedure. Both groups received 100 mg of lignocaine in the nostril, 40-50 mg to oropharynx, 120 mg to vocal cords and 40-100 mg to trachea and bronchi. Throat anaesthesia was the most common unpleasant part experienced by both groups of patients (34.5%), followed by examination of bronchi (30.6%) and nasal anaesthesia (21.8%). Significantly more patients in group A experienced discomfort or pain during nasal anaesthesia as compared to group B (p < 0.001). Patients' tolerance to the bronchoscopy was similar in both groups and the examination was performed satisfactorily in all patients. Thus, lignocaine gel is a simple technique, effective and less irritating as compared to lignocaine spray for topical nasal anaesthesia.
Adult, Aerosols, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Lidocaine, Oropharynx, Middle Aged, Nose, Bronchoscopes, Patient Satisfaction, Bronchoscopy, Fiber Optic Technology, Humans, Pharynx, Female, Nasal Cavity, Gels, Aged, Anesthesia, Local
Adult, Aerosols, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Lidocaine, Oropharynx, Middle Aged, Nose, Bronchoscopes, Patient Satisfaction, Bronchoscopy, Fiber Optic Technology, Humans, Pharynx, Female, Nasal Cavity, Gels, Aged, Anesthesia, Local
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
