Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Lactose-free formula versus adapted formula in acute infantile diarrhea].

Authors: F, Clemente Yago; C, Tapia Collados; L, Comino Almenara; L, López Peña; P, Escrivá Tomás; J, González Peraba;

[Lactose-free formula versus adapted formula in acute infantile diarrhea].

Abstract

We have studied a population of 60 children with acute diarrhea. In order to evaluate the benefit of lactose suppression from the diet on the clinical course of the disease, these children were randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. No differences were found in respects to the duration of the illness (lactose containing formula 4.8 +/- 2 days vs lactose free formula 4.4 +/- 3.1 days). Similarly, body weight change did not change significantly (12.5 +/- 235.8 gr vs 55.9 +/- 238.0 gr, t-test non-significant). Children fed with the lactose free diet voided less frequently than did children in the control group (12.8 +/- 10.5 vs 19.8 +/- 9.5 times; p < 0.01). This difference disappeared when only invasive diarrheas were considered (26.6 +/- 12 vs 21.5 +/- 9.5 voidings; t-test nonsignificant). Finally, only 2 of the 32 cases fed with lactose containing formula showed clinical intolerance to lactose. Therefore, we conclude that in patients with mild-to-moderate acute diarrhea, the resumption of feeding should be undertaken with the same formula that they were previously fed, restricting the use of lactose free formulas to selected cases and to those children in whom a standard milk made symptoms reappear.

Keywords

Chi-Square Distribution, Body Weight, Infant, Lactose, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Feces, Acute Disease, Diarrhea, Infantile, Humans, Infant Food, Treatment Failure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!