Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Canadian Medical Ass...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Illness after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.

Authors: T R, Freeman; M A, Stewart; L, Turner;

Illness after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.

Abstract

To provide accurate information on the common sequelae of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination and to compare post-vaccine symptoms in children vaccinated at 13 and 15 months.Prospective cluster randomized controlled trial.Twenty-two family practices in southwestern Ontario.All 376 infants who were due to receive MMR vaccine in the next year, 253 (67.3%) successfully completed the study.MMR vaccine administered at 13 months by half of the family physicians and at 15 months by the remaining half.Family physician's physical findings in children 7 days and 30 days after vaccine; reported illnesses by mothers in a daily diary in the month before and after vaccination and medical records of visits to family physicians and hospital admissions in the month before and after vaccination.Compared with the incidence rates in the corresponding weeks before vaccination, the rates of lymphadenopathy (23.8%) and fever (16.8%) were higher 1 week afterward and the rate of rash (26.9%) was higher 7 to 14 days afterward. Fewer health problems were reported in the third and fourth weeks after vaccination than in the corresponding weeks beforehand. Hospital admissions after vaccination were no more frequent than those before once cause and time of admission were taken into account. The two age groups did not differ in any of the outcomes.Mothers should be informed about the possibility of increased physical findings in the weeks after MMR vaccination, especially lymphadenopathy, nasal discharge and rash. Since the occurrence of sequelae does not seem to differ significantly between 13-month-old recipients and 15-month-old recipients, it should not influence the decision of when to administer the vaccine.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Observer Variation, Measles Vaccine, Age Factors, Infant, Mumps Vaccine, Drug Combinations, Humans, Female, Rubella Vaccine, Prospective Studies, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
gold