
pmid: 8204323
pmc: PMC1238817
There has been renewed interest in the moral arguments surrounding euthanasia. Some patients are now apprehensive of advanced medical technology which they fear may result in a prolonged and undignified death. In the current situation of scarce resources for health care, both patients and doctors could be coerced into considering active euthanasia if it was legally available. In this paper it is argued that doctors now need to make a clear statement rejecting active euthanasia but affirming that in certain cases passive euthanasia, or letting die, may be morally justifiable.
Physician-Patient Relations, Euthanasia, Decision Making, Right to Die, Euthanasia, Passive, United Kingdom, Suicide, Assisted, Living Wills, Euthanasia, Active, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Stress, Psychological, Wedge Argument
Physician-Patient Relations, Euthanasia, Decision Making, Right to Die, Euthanasia, Passive, United Kingdom, Suicide, Assisted, Living Wills, Euthanasia, Active, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Stress, Psychological, Wedge Argument
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
