Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Genetic and immunological differences between Japanese patients with diffuse scleroderma and limited scleroderma.

Authors: M, Satoh; M, Akizuki; M, Kuwana; T, Mimori; H, Yamagata; S, Yoshida; M, Homma; +2 Authors

Genetic and immunological differences between Japanese patients with diffuse scleroderma and limited scleroderma.

Abstract

To study the association between HLA-DR and scleroderma (SSc), subsets of SSc, and autoantibodies in SSc.HLA-DR antigens were determined in 45 Japanese patients with SSc. The association between HLA-DR and SSc, subsets of SSc, and autoantibodies was analyzed in 22 patients with SSc excluding mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)/overlap syndrome (OL).When the 20 patients with MCTD and 3 patients with OL were excluded from the original patient group, a significant increase of HLA-DR2 was observed (59 vs 29% of controls, p < 0.01). The frequency of DR2 increased to 69% in patients with diffuse SSc (p < 0.01). DR1, which was not found in diffuse SSc, was found in 2 of 9 patients with limited SSc. The frequency of DR2 was significantly higher in patients with antitopoisomerase I (10/12, 83%, p < 0.05). In contrast, DR1 was found only in 2 patients with anticentromere antibodies (ACA), and all 5 patients with ACA had no HLA-DR2 (p < 0.01).Our results suggest that different HLA-DR markers may be associated with the production of distinct autoantibodies in diffuse SSc and limited SSc.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Scleroderma, Localized, Scleroderma, Systemic, DNA Topoisomerases, Type I, Antibody Specificity, Centromere, Humans, HLA-DR Antigens, Antibodies, Autoantibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!