
To identify risk factors associated with severe preeclampsia and to determine whether these factors are similar in nulliparous and multiparous patients.Patients whose pregnancies were complicated by severe preeclampsia (n = 70) were compared retrospectively to 18,964 non-preeclamptic controls. Information on maternal demographic factors; medical, obstetric, and family histories; and neonatal outcome was retrieved and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.By logistic regression, the only risk factors associated with the development of severe preeclampsia were severe obesity in all patients (adjusted odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-7.46) and a history of preeclampsia in multiparous patients (adjusted odds ratio 7.2, 95% CI 2.74-18.74).Severe obesity and a history of preeclampsia are the only maternal risk factors identified for the development of severe preeclampsia.
Adult, Severity of Illness Index, Parity, Logistic Models, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Humans, Female, Obesity, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Severity of Illness Index, Parity, Logistic Models, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Humans, Female, Obesity, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 150 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
