Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Aerobic capacity. Differences between smokers and non-smokers. Effects of withdrawal].

Authors: M, Aparici; A L, Fernández González; E, Alegría;

[Aerobic capacity. Differences between smokers and non-smokers. Effects of withdrawal].

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the aerobic capacity in a group of smokers and to carry out a prospective study of the changes in cardiorespiratory and metabolic response to exercise after smoking withdrawal. An aerobic capacity test was performed in 90 smokers and 30 non-smokers. Afterwards, the smokers were included in a smoking withdrawal program. One year later, the aerobic capacity test was repeated in those individuals who were able to stop smoking. The initial study of the aerobic capacity during exercise showed that smokers had significantly lower values of maximal oxygen uptake per kg body weight (VO2 max./kg) (28.7 +/- 8 vs. 35.1 +/- 7 ml/kg/min) (p < 0.001), work time (5.8 +/- 2.6 vs. 7.5 +/- 3.1 min) (p < 0.01) and work load (1.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.3 W/kg) (p < 0.001) under aerobic conditions. Aerobic capacity test performed one year after smoking withdrawal in those who were able to stop smoking showed a significant increase in VO2 max./kg (35.5 +/- 6.1 vs. 31.1 +/- 5.5) (p < 0.05), work time (8.1 +/- 3.2 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.2 min) (p < 0.05) and work load (1.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4 W/kg) (p < 0.01) under aerobic conditions. No differences were observed in the aerobic capacity test performed on the ten subjects who did not stop smoking. From these data we suggest that tobacco consumption produces impairment of the aerobic capacity that can be reverted, at least in part, after smoking withdrawal.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Smoking, Humans, Female, Smoking Cessation, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Exercise, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!