Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors: P, Chilibeck; A, Calder; D G, Sale; C, Webber;

Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the short-term reproducibility of measurements of whole-body and subregion bone mass and density, as well as body composition, made by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Bone mineral content, bone mineral density and body composition were measured on two occasions, 1 to 2 weeks apart, in 21 women (average age, 20.9 [standard deviation 1.6] years). The method errors of the duplicate measurements, expressed as a percentage of the combined mean values from the two sets of measurements (i.e., as a coefficient of variation), for whole-body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, lean tissue mass and fat mass were 1.6%, 1.1%, 1.4% and 1.8% respectively. The method errors for bone mineral density in the hip were 2.2%, 1.1% and 2.5% for the neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle respectively. On the basis of the method errors and the expected treatment effects, the sample sizes needed for intervention trials (e.g., exercise training) were calculated. All of the whole-body and most of the subregion bone mineral density and lean tissue mass measurements made by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were sufficient for detecting the small changes (about 2%) expected in trials with 20 subjects, whereas measurements of subregion bone mineral content and fat mass were less precise.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Analysis of Variance, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adipose Tissue, Bone Density, Body Composition, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Body Mass Index

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!