
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the short-term reproducibility of measurements of whole-body and subregion bone mass and density, as well as body composition, made by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Bone mineral content, bone mineral density and body composition were measured on two occasions, 1 to 2 weeks apart, in 21 women (average age, 20.9 [standard deviation 1.6] years). The method errors of the duplicate measurements, expressed as a percentage of the combined mean values from the two sets of measurements (i.e., as a coefficient of variation), for whole-body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, lean tissue mass and fat mass were 1.6%, 1.1%, 1.4% and 1.8% respectively. The method errors for bone mineral density in the hip were 2.2%, 1.1% and 2.5% for the neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle respectively. On the basis of the method errors and the expected treatment effects, the sample sizes needed for intervention trials (e.g., exercise training) were calculated. All of the whole-body and most of the subregion bone mineral density and lean tissue mass measurements made by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were sufficient for detecting the small changes (about 2%) expected in trials with 20 subjects, whereas measurements of subregion bone mineral content and fat mass were less precise.
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adipose Tissue, Bone Density, Body Composition, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Body Mass Index
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adipose Tissue, Bone Density, Body Composition, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Body Mass Index
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
