Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical heterogeneity in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis.

Authors: J J, DiGiovanna; S J, Bale;

Clinical heterogeneity in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis.

Abstract

Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of cornification. While different clinical presentations of EHK have been described, the distinctions have not been clear. We have examined 52 patients with EHK from 21 families in an effort to define and characterize the specific clinical features of this disorder.We found that several features were useful for separating patients with EHK into clinical groups. The most distinctive characteristic was presence vs absence of severe palmoplantar hyperkeratosis. Twenty-nine patients in six families had this finding and were grouped into "PS types" (those with severe palm/sole hyperkeratosis). The remaining 23 patients (from 15 families) were classified as "NPS types" (those without severe palm/sole hyperkeratosis). We identified three distinct PS types and three distinct NPS types. The classification was always found to be consistent in all affected family members. In those families in which mutations were defined, keratin 1 mutations were identified in the PS types and keratin 10 mutations in the NPS types.We were able to classify our cohort of 52 patients with EHK from 21 families into distinct types. There was a correlation between presence or absence of severe palm/sole hyperkeratosis and the specific keratin involved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Foot Dermatoses, Male, Hyperkeratosis, Epidermolytic, Contracture, Adolescent, Posture, Infant, Hand Dermatoses, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Child, Preschool, Odorants, Humans, Female, Joints, Child, Gait, Dermatitis, Exfoliative, Skin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    96
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
96
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!