Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Diagnosis of FIV infection].

Authors: K, Hartmann; M, Kuffer; H, Egberink; H, Lutz; W, Kraft;

[Diagnosis of FIV infection].

Abstract

The FIV PetCheck ELISA is a practical and commercially available method routinely used for the detection of anti-FIV antibodies in FIV infection. However, false positive and false negative results occur, although the reliability of the negative results is higher than that of the positive results. To determine the predictive value of a positive result in Bavaria, 1911 randomly selected cat sera were collected. Using the PetCheck anti-FIV ELISA, 103 (5.4%) of the 1911 samples tested were positive. These positive samples were reexamined by two other ELISA and by Western Blot. Sixty-one (59.2%) were positive with the second ELISA, 53 (51.5%) with the third ELISA and 40 (40.7%) by Western Blot. Therefore, 59.2% of all positive samples could be considered false positive. The ELISA as a single method to diagnose FIV infection is not reliable in Germany due to the low prevalence of FIV infection. Therefore, a Western Blot confirmation of every positive ELISA is of absolute necessity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Predictive Value of Tests, Feline Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Germany, Blotting, Western, Cats, Prevalence, Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, False Positive Reactions, Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline, Antibodies, Viral, False Negative Reactions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!