Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Left ventricular insufficiency: systolic versus diastolic dysfunction].

Authors: M, Federmann; B, Risti; O M, Hess;

[Left ventricular insufficiency: systolic versus diastolic dysfunction].

Abstract

Left ventricular failure has been subdivided into different forms. Systolic pump failure (= systolic dysfunction) and diastolic filling failure (= diastolic dysfunction) are important entities in the overall framework of heart failure. The clinical patterns of both are presented in light of 2 case reports: systolic dysfunction involves the combination of left ventricular failure, cardiomegaly and depressed systolic ejection fraction. Diastolic dysfunction is accompanied by pulmonary congestion in the presence of a normal or only slightly enlarged ventricle and a normal ejection fraction. Prognosis of systolic dysfunction is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 40%, compared to 70% in patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction. Medical treatment of systolic dysfunction is based primarily on ACE-inhibitors followed by diuretics and digitalis. Betablockers in low doses and spironolactone can provide additional benefit. Calcium channel blockers are rarely indicated, due to their negative inotropic effects. In patients with diastolic dysfunction, however, they are the first choice because of their positive lusitropic effect on relaxation and ventricular filling. ACE-inhibitors are suitable in hypertensive heart disease, while diuretics and betablockers are second line drugs. Digitalis should be avoided since worsening of diastolic function may occur.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Heart Failure, Male, Systole, Cardiovascular Agents, Stroke Volume, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left, Diastole, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!