Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Intramedullary pressure in intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia].

Authors: D, Heim; U, Schlegel; S M, Perren;

[Intramedullary pressure in intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia].

Abstract

Intramedullary nailing of shaft fractures of the femur and tibia is a recognized operative procedure and its use has even been enlarged by the introduction of the so-called interlocking technique. In recent years case reports have been published describing peroperative pulmonary embolism during reamed femoral nailing, suggesting either an unfavorable effect of the reaming or the pressure increase in the medullary cavity while reaming and nailing. In an in vitro study on explanted human femora and tibiae we investigated the intramedullary pressure increase in reamed and unreamed nailing procedures of both bones. A lower pressure increase was noted in unreamed nailing compared to reamed nailing in the femur (289/496 mm Hg) and in the tibia (128/>833 mm Hg). The unreamed tibial nailing displayed significantly less pressure increase than the unreamed femoral nailing (p = 0.01). Opening of the medullary cavity with the so-called cheese cutter (cannulated cutter over a centering pin) showed significantly greater pressure increase in the femur than in the tibia (p = 0.01). Pressure increase seems to be dependent of the mode of insertion of the unreamed nail (ram-blows versus manual insertion), although the difference in the tibial unreamed nailing is statistically not significant.

Keywords

Embolism, Fat, Equipment Design, Biomechanical Phenomena, Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary, Tibial Fractures, Bone Marrow, Risk Factors, Hydrostatic Pressure, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Pulmonary Embolism, Femoral Fractures

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!