Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Infectious endocarditis].

Authors: A, Schaffner;

[Infectious endocarditis].

Abstract

The diagnosis of infective endocarditis remains a challenge to physicians providing primary care. On one hand this type of infection will be rarely encountered in primary care, but on the other hand this disease carries an enormous detrimental potential. Furthermore infective endocarditis, particularly in its initial phase, often has an uncharacteristic presentation with findings and symptoms shared with many much more frequent and often harmless diseases. To confront these difficulties, which are responsible for the often delayed diagnosis of infective endocarditis, strict rules must be applied. In patients at risk for infectious endocarditis no antibiotic therapy should be instituted without prior cultures. Also, in all other patients aimless, "blind" antibiotic therapy without diagnosis of a bacterial infection should be avoided. In patients with uncharacteristic symptoms and findings compatible with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis that persist for more than 5 days, blood cultures prior to any antibiotic therapy are warranted in addition to other clinical exams and tests. The sensitivity of echocardiography in detecting infective endocarditis is frequently overestimated. Furthermore, transesophageal echocardiography in endocarditis high-risk patients requires antibiotic prophylaxis which would obscure bacteriological diagnosis. For these reasons echocardiography should not be used as first test method when considering the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Staphylococcus aureus, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Endocarditis, Bacterial, Splenic Rupture, Middle Aged, Staphylococcal Infections, Combined Modality Therapy, Abscess, Endocarditis, Subacute Bacterial, Echocardiography, Streptococcal Infections, Humans, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!