Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Invasive diagnostic approaches to pulmonary infiltrates.

Authors: N A, Ettinger;

Invasive diagnostic approaches to pulmonary infiltrates.

Abstract

The clinical and radiographic presentation of pulmonary disease in organ-transplant recipients often fails to allow the specific identification of a causative pathogen or permit the distinction between infectious and noninfectious processes. Frequently, invasive procedures are required to make a specific diagnosis and initiate appropriate therapy. The early use of transtracheal aspiration proved useful for the diagnosis of bacterial and mycobacterial pneumonias. However, its inability to reliably prove pneumonia caused by opportunistic pathogens, such as Pneumocystis carinii and cytomegalovirus, led to very narrow indications for its use among organ-transplant recipients. The introduction of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the 1970s, with its large variety of related procedures, revolutionized the approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary disease among immunosuppressed patients and today remains the initial procedure of choice in the majority of clinical situations. The diagnostic success and relatively low morbidity of bronchoscopy has narrowed the indications for surgical lung biopsy, despite its excellent diagnostic yield. Open or thoracoscopic lung biopsies are most often used where bronchoscopy has failed to make a diagnosis or where the risk of bleeding prohibits a bronchoscopic biopsy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lung Diseases, Biopsy, Thoracoscopy, Decision Trees, Sputum, Organ Transplantation, Suction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Bronchoscopes, Clinical Protocols, Bronchoscopy, Humans, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!