
To study the risk factors in the development of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty, we retrospectively analysed 190 eyes of 185 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery during 1990. The donor button was larger by 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm in phakia and aphakia/pseudophakia patients, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 14.5 months, 52 of the 190 eyes (27.4%) either developed glaucoma de novo or had worsening of preexisting glaucoma. Of these 52 eyes, 38 were managed medically and 14 required surgery. From our study, aphakia (37%), pseudophakia (24%), preexisting glaucoma (81.8%), and regrafting (43.18%) were found to be the significant risk factors in the development of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty.
Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Incidence, Visual Acuity, Glaucoma, Aphakia, Postcataract, RE1-994, Ophthalmology, Glaucoma - Penetrating keratoplasty - Risk factors - Aphakia - Pseudophakia, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Incidence, Visual Acuity, Glaucoma, Aphakia, Postcataract, RE1-994, Ophthalmology, Glaucoma - Penetrating keratoplasty - Risk factors - Aphakia - Pseudophakia, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
