Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Cisplatin/5-FU versus carboplatin/5-FU. 5 year follow-up].

Authors: O, Ebeling; H E, Eckel; P, Volling; K, Heitmann; M, Vössing;

[Cisplatin/5-FU versus carboplatin/5-FU. 5 year follow-up].

Abstract

Between March 1986 and October 1987, 73 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck underwent initial chemotherapy before surgery and/or radiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of three courses of carboplatin/5-FU or cisplatin/5-FU. Pretreatment tumor states, remission rates and ages of the patients were comparable. Carboplatin as a modification of cisplatin showed significantly less gastrointestinal nerval and ototoxic side effects. After five years of followup, 30% of the patients treated with carboplatin and 33% of the cisplatinum group were alive and clinically free of disease. In contrast, 97% of all patients treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy have died. The data fails to support a "downstaging" of disease. These results document that the only prognostic factor for long-term survival is histologically complete resection of tumor. Further studies must compare the influence of prior chemotherapy and surgery, both followed by conventional fractionated radiotherapy in resectable tumors. Findings show that induction chemotherapy should not be used for unresectable tumors or for sequential chemo-radiotherapy. The use of carboplatin is preferred since oncological efficiency is comparable while side-effects are significantly less.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Combined Modality Therapy, Carboplatin, Survival Rate, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!