Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer].

Authors: C, Cordiano; E, Laterza; S U, Urso; G, Castaldini;

[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer].

Abstract

From June 1987 to December 1993 in our Institute we treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy 94 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma. The neoadjuvant protocol consisted in 3000 cGy and two cycles of chemotherapy (5-FU, 1000 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 DDP). At the end of this treatment patients underwent surgery. Operability rate was 76.6%, post-operative morbidity was not affected by the neoadjuvant treatment and post-operative mortality rate was 9.5%. Histopathology showed in 15 cases no residual disease (T0) and in 12 patients minimal residual of disease, with isolated neoplastic microfoci in the esophageal wall. The longest survival was of seventy months with medium follow-up of 16.8 months. Overall actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier test) at one, two, three years were 54%, 34%, and 23% respectively. Our experience showed a better survival of the patients treated with surgery alone, a better operability and resectability rates. However, it is mandatory to wait for the results of perspective randomized studies to evaluate the real advantages of this treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Esophageal Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!