Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The IUD and uterine perforation].

Authors: P R, Broso; G, Buffetti;

[The IUD and uterine perforation].

Abstract

The intrauterine device (IUD) is an effective and relatively safe contraceptive. Approximately 15% of women of child-bearing age in Italy use the IUD. The major health risks associated with IUD use are perforation of the uterus, pregnancy (both intrauterine and ectopic), and pelvic inflammatory disease. Perforation of the uterus by an IUD is a serious complication and this is possible both during the insertion and later. Perforation of the uterus is rare, but potentially fatal. The incidence is of 0.12-0.68/1000 insertion. Although some patients have signs and symptoms suggestive of perforation (pain or bleeding), many are apparently asymptomatic at the time the diagnosis of perforation is made. Perforation is often suspected or diagnosed when the IUD string is no longer visible at the external os. A patient who has sustained a perforation is not protected against pregnancy. Numerous factors affect perforation: the type of IUD, the uterine size and position, timing of the insertion in relation to the last delivery or abortion and the experience of the clinical. Serious consequences have been described, such as severe damage to the viscera (i.e. bowel, kidney) and/or peritonitis. The diagnosis is clinical, ultrasonic, radiological and coelioscopic. Coelioscopic diagnosis makes it possible to choose the method of treatment. In experienced hands, this method is rapid, the hospitalization required short and the sequelae simple.

Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Uterine Perforation, Humans, Female, Intrauterine Devices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!