Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Double and triple neoplasms in endometrial carcinoma].

Authors: H, Schünemann; M, Jourdain;

[Double and triple neoplasms in endometrial carcinoma].

Abstract

From 1968-1992 1503 endometrial carcinomas have been evaluated at Bad Trissl Clinic retrospectively. All double and triple carcinomas have been histologically recorded, doubtful cases have been excluded. Double malignomas that occurred within 6 months are termed simultaneous, all others are termed successive ones. Of 1503 endometrial carcinomas 163 (10.8%) were multiple tumors. Of these 100 (6.6%) occur together with breast cancer and 63 (4.2%) with other primary malignomas. 145 (9.6%) are double, 18 (1.2%) are triple malignomas. 10 precancerous cases (0.7%) have been included in the survey. The average latency period from the first to the second malignoma was 4.5 years. Patients with endometrial carcinoma run higher risks of secondary tumors. One out of 10 develops a double malignoma, one out of 100 a triple malignoma. The combination of endometrial and breast cancer occurs in 60% of cases, the combination of genital and breast cancer in nearly 80% of cases. After-care of endometrial carcinoma must also include early detection of potential double and triple malignomas.

Keywords

Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Endometrial Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!