The need for a routine preoperative intravenous cholangiogram (IVC) has been controversially discussed. We decided to assess if preoperative criteria such as history, clinical examination or laboratory findings could be used for selective indication for preoperative IVC. In a series of 146 patients with a preoperative IVC before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, history, clinical findings and laboratory results (bilirubin, transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, amylase) have been correlated with the radiological findings. ERCP was taken as the standard to assess the value of IVC. A normal IVC was quite reliable in excluding any pathology of the bile ducts or common bile duct stones. Thus specificity reached 96% and the negative predictive value was 97%. On the other hand a pathological IVC proved not to be a valid predictor of true pathological alterations. Sensitivity was only 60% and the positive predictive value just 55%. Over all accuracy was quite satisfactory (94%). We could not find a correlation between history, clinical or laboratory findings and the final result as assessed by ERCP. Therefore we could not find any useful parameters to define a selective policy for indication of preoperative IVC. On the other hand the IVC still proved useful to exclude relevant pathological findings. At the time being there is no strong argument for abandoning routine preoperative IVC.