Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Authors: J R, Sanabria; S, Gallinger; R, Croxford; S M, Strasberg;

Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Abstract

Most cholecystectomies can be performed using a laparoscopic approach. However, 3 to 10 percent of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) must be converted to open cholecystectomies (OC) and preoperative factors that predict risk for conversion are still not defined.Preoperative and intraoperative data were collected and analyzed from 628 patients who were scheduled for elective LC by two surgeons in an academic institution. Logistic regression was performed on data from two groups of patients: LC completed, 596 patients (95 percent) and LC converted, 32 patients (5 percent).Elective LC was accomplished with no common bile duct injuries, low morbidity rate (7.3 percent), and zero mortality rate. Both patient and surgeon factors predicted conversion from LC to OC. Older patients (65 years of age or older, (p < 0.01), males (p < 0.01), and patients with multiple attacks (ten or more) of biliary colic (p < 0.01), or a documented history of acute cholecystitis (p < 0.01) had a greater risk for conversion. Both surgeons had higher rates of conversion (p < 0.05) during the learning phase (fewer than 50 LC) of their experience.Risk factors for conversion may be predicted and awareness of these factors should help in the selection of the appropriate procedure for patients and in selection of cases for resident training.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Patients, Decision Trees, Age Factors, Gallbladder Diseases, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Postoperative Complications, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    88
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
88
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!