Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

ESWL: current aspects.

Authors: A S, Schmidt; F, Eisenberger;

ESWL: current aspects.

Abstract

Ten years after the first application, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has gained world-wide acceptance as first choice therapy of urinary calculi. The introduction of different shock wave sources, shock wave coupling and imaging techniques have influenced treatment comfort, need of anesthesia, and costs of the device, but did not improve efficacy of treatment regarding complete disintegration of calculi without need for secondary treatments. Therefore the optimal device for lithotripsy providing high efficacy, no need for anesthesia, and inducing minimal tissue trauma has not been found yet. ESWL represents first choice therapy of ureteral stones without prior endoscopic manipulations. Under the conditions of fluoroscopic imaging and high shock wave energy stone-free rates up to 90% can be achieved. For the treatment of staghorn stones ESWL-monotherapy seems to be suitable for smaller calculi only, while larger stone burden classified by surface area calculation represents an indication for initial percutaneous approach. Although with both methods complete stone clearance cannot be achieved in more than 80% of cases, relief of symptoms and infection occurs more likely.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Kidney Calculi, Ureteral Calculi, Lithotripsy, Humans, Urinary Calculi, Equipment Design, Kidney Calices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!