Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Sensitivity of the platelet immunofluorescence test (PIFT) and the MAIPA assay for the detection of platelet-reactive alloantibodies: a report on two U.K. National Platelet Workshop exercises.

Authors: D L, Allen; J, Chapman; P K, Phillips; W H, Ouwehand;

Sensitivity of the platelet immunofluorescence test (PIFT) and the MAIPA assay for the detection of platelet-reactive alloantibodies: a report on two U.K. National Platelet Workshop exercises.

Abstract

This report presents the results of two National Workshop exercises which were designed to evaluate interlaboratory and interassay variation in sensitivity of techniques used for the detection of platelet-reactive alloantibodies. Most workshop participants used the platelet immunofluorescence test. Sensitivity of this assay was improved when fluorescence was measured by flow cytometer rather than by microscope. The MAIPA assay was found to be highly sensitive but required considerable technical expertise, and the choice of antiglycoprotein IIb/IIIa (CD61/41) monoclonal antibody was found to have a significant effect on its ability to detect anti-HPA-1a.

Keywords

Blood Platelets, Immunoassay, Isoantigens, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Reproducibility of Results, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Flow Cytometry, Sensitivity and Specificity, United Kingdom, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Antibody Specificity, Isoantibodies, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!