Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Pneumatic contact lithotripsy].

Authors: N A, Lopatkin; A G, Martov; A A, Kamalov; B L, Gushchin;

[Pneumatic contact lithotripsy].

Abstract

The safety and clinical efficacy of electrohydraulic, ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotriptors were compared in experiments on dog ureters and plaster plates. Electrohydraulic and pneumatic were most effective contact lithotriptors. The safest of them was pneumatic, ultrasonic was safer than electrohydraulic. "Lithoclast" lithotripter (EMS) was used in 209 patients who altogether had 327 calculi in the upper and lower urinary tracts. The mechanism of action is based on the transfer of the kinetic discharge energy to the probe and eventually to the concrement. The probes with diameter 2.4, 3, 4.8, 6 FR were employed fitting the channels of ureteropyelocysto- and nephroscopes. Irrespective of chemical structure, successful disintegration was conducted in 97.5% of the concrements. The duration of lithotripsy was 2-60 min. No complications The duration of lithotripsy was 2-60 min. No complications were registered due to pneumatic lithotriptor "Lithoclast" application.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Air, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Lithotripsy, Humans, Female, Urinary Calculi, Child, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!