Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors: H, Reich; P J, Maher; C, Wood;

Laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Abstract

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a substitute for abdominal hysterectomy and not for vaginal hysterectomy. Most hysterectomies currently performed with an abdominal approach may be performed with laparoscopic dissection of part or all of the abdominal portion followed by vaginal removal, including fibroids of 1000 g. There are many surgical advantages, particularly magnification of anatomy and pathology, easy access to the vagina and rectum, and the ability to achieve complete haemostasis and clot evacuation during underwater examination. Patient advantages are multiple and are related to avoidance of a pain producing abdominal incision. They include a reduced period of hospitalization and recuperation and an extremely low rate of cuff infection and ileus. It must be emphasized that conversion to laparotomy when the surgeon becomes uncomfortable with the laparoscopic approach should never be considered a complication; it is rather a prudent surgical decision that will profoundly decrease patient risk. The laparoscope can be used in combination with hysterectomy in a variety of ways with significant surgical and patient advantages. With few exceptions, laparoscopic hysterectomy can replace abdominal hysterectomy. Surgical outcome is the same. In experienced hands, the complication rate is low. Patient benefits are related to avoidance of an abdominal incision and include improved cosmetics and more rapid recovery.

Keywords

Preoperative Care, Endometriosis, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Hysterectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!