Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Bond strength of resin cements to microfilled composites.

Authors: E J, DeSchepper; W H, Tate; J M, Powers;

Bond strength of resin cements to microfilled composites.

Abstract

The in vitro bond strengths of three resin cements and a light-cured and a laboratory-processed micro-filled composite were measured. Effects of two surface treatments, and three bond enhancers were analyzed. Resin cements were bonded to sandblasted composite substrates, stored at 37 degrees C in 100% humidity overnight, and debonded in tension. An analysis of variance revealed significant differences among bond strengths. Overall, the composite substrate had the largest effect on bond strength, followed by bond enhancer, cement and, finally, surface treatment. Mean bond strengths ranged from 0.9 to 13.6 MPa. A combination of Concept, Dual Cement, phosphoric acid and Silane produced the lowest mean bond strength (0.9 MPa), while EOS, Dual Cement, hydrofluoric acid, and Heliobond produced the highest recorded mean bond strength (13.6 MPa). In general, the highest bonds were produced using the light-cured composite (EOS), the acrylic monomer (Special Bond II) or the dimethacrylate monomer (Heliobond), the adhesive cement (CR Inlay Cement), and surface treatment with hydrofluoric acid (Comp-Etch). Most of the bond failures (86%) with the laboratory-cured microfilled composite were adhesive. With the light-cured composite, 69% of the failures were mixed adhesive-cohesive types.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Analysis of Variance, Acid Etching, Dental, Acrylates, Materials Testing, Dental Bonding, Dental Cements, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Phosphoric Acids, Silanes, Composite Resins, Hydrofluoric Acid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!