Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy.

Authors: F, Nezhat; C H, Nezhat; D, Admon; S, Gordon; C, Nezhat;

Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy.

Abstract

Before the appropriate use of laparoscopy in hysterectomy can be determined, it is necessary to evaluate the results, including complications. There must also be an accepted classification system to facilitate accurate comparison to total abdominal hysterectomy.We retrospectively evaluated the charts of 361 women who underwent hysterectomy for various benign pathologic conditions. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates for hysterectomy performed at operative laparoscopy were examined. The hysterectomies were classified as one of four types according to the number of steps performed laparoscopically. All women were candidates for total abdominal hysterectomy, but not vaginal hysterectomy.The overall complication rate for hysterectomy performed at operative laparoscopy was 11.1 percent. Most complications were minor, including cystitis (1.66 percent), transient high fever (1.39 percent), abdominal wall ecchymosis (1.12 percent), and pneumonia and bronchitis (1.12 percent). There was no correlation between the type of laparoscopic hysterectomy performed and the complication rate.Our rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic hysterectomy compares favorably with published complication rates for vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Ligaments, Fever, Broad Ligament, Ecchymosis, Electrosurgery, Pneumonia, Middle Aged, Hysterectomy, Cystitis, Hysterectomy, Vaginal, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Bronchitis, Intraoperative Complications, Abdominal Muscles, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!