Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Removal rates of subdermal levonorgestrel implants.

Authors: D, van Amerongen;

Removal rates of subdermal levonorgestrel implants.

Abstract

This study attempted to quantify an achievable removal rate of subdermal levonorgestrel implants (SLIs) in an unselected population and develop strategies for increasing continuation. Over 16 months, 1,076 SLIs were inserted in eligible patients from a lower socioeconomic group at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Extensive preinsertion and postinsertion counseling and follow-up care were given. Patients developing problems were counseled and managed conservatively. If a patient requested removal of the Norplant after this process, removal was done. Twenty-two removals occurred due to SLI-related problems, for a rate of 2.04%; no trends based on age or parity were found. The most common reasons for removal were bleeding/irregular menses (31.8%), headaches (18.1%) and hair loss (13.6%). An episode of thrombophlebitis, not thought to be caused by the SLI, led to one removal. Seventy-seven percent of removals occurred in the first six months, with peak rates in the fourth and fifth. Five patients became pregnant inadvertently within six months of removal. An extremely low removal rate and high continuation rate are possible in an inner city clinic population at risk for unintended pregnancy. Acceptance will increase if the SLI can be maintained at least past six months. Extensive counseling, patient support and conservative medical management constitute a successful approach.

Keywords

Adult, Drug Implants, Patient Dropouts, Adolescent, Headache, Alopecia, Levonorgestrel, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Unwanted, Sex Counseling, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Menstruation Disturbances, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!