Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Reclosure of the open abdomen.

Authors: D, Sleeman; J L, Sosa; A, Gonzalez; M, McKenney; I, Puente; L, Matos; L, Martin;

Reclosure of the open abdomen.

Abstract

The open abdomen technique for the treatment of diffuse peritonitis has gained acceptance. Our approach has been to use the zipper technique with daily irrigations. Once the abdominal problem has resolved, the mesh and zipper are removed. Surgeons are reluctant to reoperate on patients with such prior treatment because of the anticipation of a hostile abdomen. Our study is a retrospective review of 12 patients who were treated with the open abdomen technique. At a later date, they underwent elective reoperation.The charts of 12 patients were reviewed. After initial injury, the patients were in the surgical intensive care unit. Reoperations were performed nine months (mean) after discharge from this facility. The reasons for reoperation were closure of enteric fistula (five patients) and closure of an ostomy (seven patients). The abdominal wall was reconstructed in nine patients. In the other three patients, the abdomen was entered through a lateral incision and the bowel was reanastomosed.All of the patients survived. There were five complications. Two patients had ischemic skin grafts successfully treated by hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO). Two patients had ischemic skin flaps that were covering mesh. They responded to HBO with minimal slough of superficial tissue. One patient had a low output fistula that closed after two weeks of total parenteral nutrition.A history of an open abdomen is not a contraindication to later operation. Bowel continuity can be restored and abdominal wall reconstruction can be performed safely. This can be done as early as three to four months after recovery from the original injury.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Abdomen, Acute, Adult, Reoperation, Enterostomy, Abdominal Injuries, Middle Aged, Peritonitis, Surgical Mesh, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Intestinal Fistula, Humans, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!