Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Emergency colonic surgery. Value of intervention in delayed emergency].

Authors: A, Gavelli; M, Trutman; D, De Millo-Terrazzani; J C, Boiselle; C, Huguet;

[Emergency colonic surgery. Value of intervention in delayed emergency].

Abstract

Currently, there is a trend towards emergency colectomy in patients requiring immediate care for lesions involving the large bowel. However, the therapeutic indications have not been fully identified. We therefore retrospectively evaluated our experience with 123 emergency situations.Among 745 cases requiring colonic surgery from January 1985 to August 1992, 123 were seen in emergency for intestinal obstruction (n = 69; 56.1%), peritonitis (n = 41; 33.3%) or haemorrhage (n = 13; 10.6%). The mean age of the patient was 71 years and 50% were over 75. The left colon was involved in 76.4% of the cases. Diverticulitis was seen in 43.1% and 39% had cancer of the colon.Emergency resection and anastomosis was performed in 55 cases (44.7%) without colostomy. In 62 patients (50.4%) a colostomy was created; 46 were later removed. In 61 cases, the patients underwent emergency surgery within 24 hours and in the other 62, delayed surgery was performed after one day of hospitalization. Overall hospital mortality was 11.4% (14/123), 20% for patients over 75 and 3.2% for those under 75. Mortality after delayed operations was lower (6.5%) than after emergency surgery (17.2%). There was also a higher rate of colon resections without colostomy in delayed procedures (62.9% vs 26.2%).Our experience leads us to recommend delayed surgery whenever possible in order to decrease operative mortality and number of operations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Middle Aged, Peritonitis, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Colonic Diseases, Colostomy, Humans, Female, Emergencies, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Colectomy, Intestinal Obstruction, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!