Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion provides the physiological basis of perfusable tissue index.

Authors: P, Herrero; A, Staudenherz; J F, Walsh; R J, Gropler; S R, Bergmann;

Heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion provides the physiological basis of perfusable tissue index.

Abstract

Assessment of viable from nonviable myocardium is critical for the care of patients being considered for revascularization procedures. Recently, the perfusable tissue index (PTI) has been proposed as an index of myocardial viability.Computer simulations were performed for homogeneously and heterogeneously perfused tissue over a wide range of flows (0.04-6.4 ml/g/min) using both bolus and infusion inputs.PTI estimated from simulated homogeneously perfused tissue did reflect the amount of tissue being perfused independent of absolute level of flow, type of input or model configuration, whereas PTI obtained from simulated heterogeneously perfused tissue was consistently lower than the simulated "true" PTI and varied with flow, type of input function and model configuration. Flow estimated with 15O-water was not significantly different from that measured with radio labeled microspheres.Oxygen-15-water can diffuse into both acutely and chronically ischemic myocardium irrespective of its functional status. The results suggest that PTI is most likely an index of the heterogeneity of myocardial flow rather than an index of the amount of tissue being perfused. Its utility for delineating myocardial viability is thus related to the amount of tissue perfused that has low absolute levels of perfusion or high degrees of flow heterogeneity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Perfusion, Analysis of Variance, Dogs, Oxygen Radioisotopes, Coronary Circulation, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia, Animals, Regression Analysis, Computer Simulation, Radionuclide Imaging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!