
Emergency cesarean section is sometimes required for acute fetal distress but also for some maternal vital emergencies. In spite of its maternal (Mendelson's syndrome, difficult intubation) and fetal (neonatal depression) risks, general anaesthesia was classically used. The arguments in favor of regional anaesthesia techniques for emergency cesarean section and the respective advantages of spinal and epidural anaesthesia are developed in this text. The already functioning epidural catheter can be used to rapidly convert analgesia for labor to anaesthesia for cesarean section: this situation is probably the simplest to manage but requires that parturients at risk for cesarean section were recognized in early labor, especially all the parturients with a suspected difficult airway. In case of patchy or unilateral analgesia, it is particularly important to resite the catheter to avoid the need for emergency general anaesthesia to solve an inadequate epidural anaesthesia for cesarean section. Spinal anaesthesia is the technique of choice for its rapidity of action but its hemodynamic risks need a prior careful evaluation of maternal hemodynamics. General anaesthesia will be always indispensable in some cases; therefore, every anaesthetist should maintain sufficient experience and skills in the management of some of its complications, especially intubation difficulties.
Adult, Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, General, Pregnancy Complications, Anesthesia, Conduction, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Emergencies
Adult, Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, General, Pregnancy Complications, Anesthesia, Conduction, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Emergencies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
