
Anorectal strictures have been a serious problem for many years. The aim of this study was to determine the experience with anoplasty in our institution. A group of 17 patients, (six males and 11 females) were evaluated between May 1989 and February 1994, with an age range of 20 to 78 (mean 61 years). The main symptoms were difficulty to pass stool or constipation in 10 patients (58.8 per cent), rectal bleeding in eight patients (47 per cent), and anorectal pain in seven patients (41.1 per cent). The patients underwent clinical examination and the findings were anal stenosis in 13 patients (76.4 per cent), perianal fistula in two patients (11.8 per cent), key hole deformity in one patient (5.9 per cent), and unhealed chronic fissure in one patient (5.9 per cent). The technical procedure was S plasty in six patients (35.2 per cent) and advancement flaps in 11 (64.8 per cent). The follow-up period was between 3 and 59 (mean 18) months. In 16 patients, surgery had good results with improvement of their preoperative symptoms and preservation of continence. There was one septic complication; mean hospital stay was 3 days. In conclusion, anoplasty appears to be a safe and successful alternative for the treatment of anal stenosis.
Adult, Male, Anus Diseases, Pain, Constriction, Pathologic, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Female, Constipation, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Anus Diseases, Pain, Constriction, Pathologic, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Female, Constipation, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
