Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Stereotactic brain biopsy].

Authors: Y, Shoshan; S H, Pomeranz; D, Sofer; E, Ashkenazi; Z, Israel; F, Umansky;

[Stereotactic brain biopsy].

Abstract

During a 3-year period starting in 1991, 49 patients with brain lesions underwent 50 stereotactic brain biopsy procedures. The average age was 46 years (range 4-74). Specimens were taken from various brain regions, particularly from the deep aspect of the cerebral hemispheres and midline structures. The pathologic entities included 27 gliomas (13 glioblastomas, 6 astrocytomas, 3 anaplastic astrocytomas, 1 pilocytic astrocytoma and 4 oligodendrogliomas), 5 lymphomas, 2 germinomas, 1 primitive neuroectodermal tumor, 2 metastatic tumors and 11 non-neoplastic lesions (4 demyelination, 2 infarcts, 1 hematoma, 1 brain abscess, 1 radiation necrosis, 1 Alzheimer's disease and in 1 case no diagnosis). The diagnostic success of the stereotactic brain biopsies in this series was 96% (in 98% of the patients). The mean hospital stay was 3 days. 1 patient with a multifocal bilateral glioblastoma died due to early postoperative hematoma of the basal ganglia (2%). Another 2 patients underwent craniotomy due to post-biopsy hematoma. They continued to suffer from hemiparesis after discharge. Transient Horner's syndrome was noted in 1 patient. Thus the permanent morbidity rate was 4%. We conclude that stereotactic brain biopsy can be performed relatively safely, has a high diagnostic yield, and facilitates planning of treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Brain Diseases, Adolescent, Brain Neoplasms, Biopsy, Brain, Middle Aged, Stereotaxic Techniques, Child, Preschool, Humans, Child, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!