Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The relativity of biocompatibility. A critique of the concept of biocompatibility.

Authors: J H, Boss; I, Shajrawi; J, Aunullah; D G, Mendes;

The relativity of biocompatibility. A critique of the concept of biocompatibility.

Abstract

The concept of biocompatibility of the materials used in surgical reconstruction of joints, ligaments, and tendons is controversial, as evinced by the conflicting definitions proposed by the many authors who have studied the host reaction to the presence of implants and their breakdown products. We propose that biocompatibility of contemporary medical implants is not a property of the chemical composition of the biomaterials but depends rather on their physical attributes. The histological reaction patterns of tissue to the presence of polyethylene in diverse physical states are described. The inflammatory response evoked by the implants is laudable in so far as it precedes and accompanies the adequate tissular incorporation of the devices used. On the other hand, the granulomatous reaction induced by small, irregularly shaped and edgy breakdown products adversely affects the life span of the implants. Thus the manner in which the host handles the biomaterials is determined primarily by the physical state of the biomaterials (rather than their chemical composition), which in turn determines the success or failure of reconstructive surgery. It logically follows that biocompatibility constitutes a relativistic concept.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Reoperation, Synovitis, Granuloma, Foreign-Body, Joint Prosthesis, Macrophages, Bone Cements, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Prosthesis Failure, Tendons, Ligaments, Articular, Animals, Humans, Joint Diseases, Polyethylenes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!