
pmid: 7669497
handle: 11379/30889
Sixty-four consecutive patients with hepatic trauma were examined. Five (7.8%) patients were managed nonoperatively and 59 (92.2%) underwent immediate laparotomy. Nonoperative management is appropriate in hemodinamically stable patients. It requires increasing use of computed tomography instead of peritoneal lavage to evaluate stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with complicated associated injuries must be excluded. Analysis of patients who underwent immediate abdominal exploration showed that grade I through grade III injuries of AAST classification are the most common in blunt hepatic trauma (84.75%). Associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring operation for ongoing hemorrhage were observed in 50% of these patients. In the management of grade I through grade III hepatic injuries a simple suture was a safe and highly effective treatment. More complex injuries actively bleeding were controlled by finger fracture technique to achieve intrahepatic hemostasis with selective vascular ligation. Hepatic resection was exceptionally required (2%). On the contrary, resection was required in grade IV injuries with extensive parenchymal destruction and in grade V lesions for a better vascular control of the ruptured suprahepatic veins.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Liver, Child, Preschool, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Adolescent; Adult; Aged; 80 and over; Child; Preschool; Female; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Wounds and Injuries, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Liver, Child, Preschool, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Adolescent; Adult; Aged; 80 and over; Child; Preschool; Female; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Wounds and Injuries, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
