Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Electrocoagulation diathermy.

Authors: W, Chanen;

Electrocoagulation diathermy.

Abstract

With experience extending over an interval of 25 years, one single application of electrocoagulation diathermy has been substantiated as a most consistent and effective method of eradicating precancerous lesions of the cervix. Although there is a protocol for selection that must be adhered to, the vast majority of patients with CIN lesions are suitable for this method of ablative therapy. Ablation by electrocoagulation diathermy appears to have distinct advantages over other methods because of the following: 1. Very high cure rates (98%) with first-time treatment can be achieved, even for major dysplasia and/or carcinoma in situ. 2. Extensive and deep lesions can be effectively eradicated irrespective of the purported histological severity. 3. Electrodiathermy is capable of eradicating lesions extending into the endocervical canal, providing anatomical limits can be evaluated colposcopically. 4. The technique is simple and rapid. The versatility of the electrodes facilitates eradication of the lesion irrespective of the shape and contour of the cervix. 5. No expensive capital outlay nor costly maintenance of equipment is required. 6. There are no physical hazards for medical personnel. 7. It is cost-effective--the technique is readily adaptable as a true out-patient procedure on a 'walk in, walk out' basis. 8. It has a very low incidence of surgical morbidity and does not jeopardize physiological and reproductive function. 9. For practical purposes, the subsequent risk of development of invasive cancer of the cervix can be effectively eliminated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Neoplasm, Residual, Treatment Outcome, Contraindications, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!