
This is a prospective study on 123 randomly selected patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of rebound tenderness as a clinical diagnostic tool was statistically compared to those of some other physical signs; namely guarding, rigidity and Rovsing's sign. Rebound tenderness was found to carry the highest sensitivity (94.7%), negative predictive value (81.3%), reliability (49.1%), and association with histological diagnosis (P < 0.05). However, its specificity and positive predictive value was not significantly different from those of other physical signs. It is concluded that, in contradistinction to some previously published reports, our study emphasizes the role of rebound tenderness in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Pain, Appendicitis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Acute Disease, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Pain, Appendicitis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Acute Disease, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
