Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Diagnosis of trichinellosis in living pigs using indirect ELISA].

Authors: K, Nöckler; W P, Voigt; D, Protz; A, Miko; K, Ziedler;

[Diagnosis of trichinellosis in living pigs using indirect ELISA].

Abstract

A modified E/S-ELISA based on the procedure described by Gamble et al. (1988) was used for the diagnosis of trichinellosis in the domestic pig. The results of screening the sera of 92 pigs experimentally infected with Trichinella larvae (T. spiralis, T. nativa) with different doses, confirmed that the E/S-ELISA is suitable for the serological detection of Trichinella-specific IgG. Although the serotest shows a high sensitivity especially in the case of a low infection rate, it can not be used as an alternative for traditional meat inspection methods because of its so called diagnostic window. On the other hand, this serotest is considered to be useful for herd monitoring. False-negative results prior to completed seroconversion (the diagnostic window) were in most cases encountered up to the 4th-5th week post infection (p.i.), depending on the infectious dose used. Due to the prolonged persistence of antibodies, it was possible to demonstrate Trichinella infections by serology for a relatively long period (at least 80 weeks p.i.). Predictably, all 960 swine sera from the field tested in the E/S ELISA were negative for Trichinella. Separation and staining of the E/S antigen in SDS-PAGE revealed altogether 4 major protein bands with molecular weights of 44-67 kD. The 44 kD band showed the most intense reaction in an immunoblot using Trichinella antibodies. In contrast to the E/S-antigen, in the immunoblot using the same defined sera, the protein bands of somatic antigen caused cross reactions with non specific antibodies, which would lead to false-positive results in the ELISA.

Keywords

Swine Diseases, Swine, Immunoglobulin G, Trichinella, Antibodies, Helminth, Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Trichinellosis, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!