Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia--present status: aerospace considerations.

Authors: S, Diamond;

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia--present status: aerospace considerations.

Abstract

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to reduce myopia has been studied the past 3 yrs at multicenters authorized by the FDA. The excimer laser ablates the central cornea to a new calculated power. A review of the cases reported in the literature reveals the following information: Corneal scarring may be reflected in the loss of best-corrected vision. Regression of the refractive effect is a complication. Predictability was the percentage of eyes obtaining 20/40 or better vision; this varied from 62.5-91%. Conversely, 9.0-37.5% were 20/50 or worse. Low to moderate myopes had better visual success. Accuracy was the refractive correction within +/- 1.00 D (spherical equivalent); this varied between 64.7-93%. The higher percentages were with low to moderate degrees of myopia. Loss of best corrected vision was due to scarring and haze, and occurred more frequently with high myopia and deeper ablations. Patient satisfaction after 2 yrs was reported as 82.6-90%; 17.4% were not satisfied.a) PRK effectively and safely corrected myopia and myopic astigmatism; b) there was no diurnal variation of refraction or vision; c) vision remained fairly stable with some regression up to 24 mo and; d) accuracy of correction to +/- 1.00 D was fair. Disadvantages: a) post-operative scarring and haze was present after 6 mo to 2 yrs of follow-up in some cases. Scarring was less with low myopia and worse with high myopia; b) regression of correction and blur; and c) poor night vision, halos, and glare sensitivity occurred after pupil dilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Wound Healing, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Aerospace Medicine, Visual Acuity, Humans, Lasers, Excimer, Photorefractive Keratectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!