Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laryngeal cancer.

Authors: A J, Tuyns;

Laryngeal cancer.

Abstract

By and large, the incidence of laryngeal cancer is tending to increase over time in much of the world, often in parallel with changes in tobacco and/or alcohol consumption. There are encouraging examples of declining trends that can be attributed to decreasing use of either tobacco or alcohol. These observations are in line with what is known about the multiplicative effects of both exposures. Since it is now well known that the epidemiology of cancer of the epilarynx differs from that of the endolarynx, it is highly desirable that in the future, this should be better reflected in the way laryngeal tumours are classified. There is good reason to believe that a change in alcohol consumption would have an effect on neoplasms of the epilarynx, whereas a change in tobacco consumption would affect incidence of neoplasms of the lower larynx. To examine this hypothesis, combined analyses of both lung and laryngeal cancer trends may have to be carried out together and compared, as in a recent Italian study (Capocaccia et al, in press). Research along these lines should provide a better understanding of how time trends in laryngeal cancer incidence can be related to changes in either tobacco and/or alcohol consumption. We know enough to believe that continuous efforts to reduce the consumption of either factor would result in a decrease in laryngeal cancer and that the biggest effect could be expected from a simultaneous reduction in alcohol and tobacco consumption (Tuyns, 1991).

Keywords

Male, Asia, Lung Neoplasms, Alcohol Drinking, Incidence, Smoking, Europe, Humans, Female, Americas, Laryngeal Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!