Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Immunobiological behaviour of rabbit precipitating and non-precipitating (co-precipitating) antibodies.

Authors: R A, Margni; G, Perdigón; C, Abatángelo; T, Gentile; R A, Binaghi;

Immunobiological behaviour of rabbit precipitating and non-precipitating (co-precipitating) antibodies.

Abstract

Complement fixing capacity, antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity and in vivo opsonic function of rabbit anti-DNP precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies were analysed. Precipitating antibody activated the complement system, but co-precipitating antibody did not. Both antibody preparations behaved similarly in antibody-dependent cytotoxicity reactions. When chicken erythrocytes were employed as target cells, both antibodies were inactive with homologous (rabbit) lymphocytes as effector cells but were active with heterologous lymphoid effector cells (human, guinea-pig). Clearance of antigen from the blood of mice was accelerated following injection of an optimal dose of precipitating antibody but co-precipitating antibody was ineffective even at different doses. Competition between precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies in complement fixation and antigen elimination following interaction with antigen successively or at the same time was investigated. In these tests, both antibodies competed with antigen by mass but not by affinity. The possibility exists that co-precipitating antibody has one high and one low affinity binding site and thus acts as an univalent blocking antibody and is therefore not able to form active complexes with antigen. The possible role of co-precipitating antibody in some humoral and cellular immune mechanisms is discussed.

Keywords

Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Dinitrobenzenes, Precipitins, Complement Fixation Tests, Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity, Animals, Lymphocytes, Rabbits, Opsonin Proteins

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!